
Photo #1



a) Gregory Crewdson, Untitled, 2005
b) SS: 800 Reason: the photo is crisp, with no blur of motion from the subjects or from the photographer.
c) F12.5 Reason: there is a large depth of field: the photo as a whole is in focus
d) ISO: 200 Reason: there is little to no noise

Photo #2
a) Francessa Woodman, Yet, Another Leaden Sky, 1977
b) SS: 500 Reason: the photo contains no blur of motion
c) F10 reason: the is no point of focus, the whole photo is in focus
d) ISO: 600 Reason: the photo is not noisy, but not as crisp as possible

Photo #3
a) Elliot Erwitt, New York City, 1946
b) SS: 800 Reason: the subjects are perfectly still with no blur of motion
c) F3.5 Reason: the photo focuses on the two subjects while the rest of the photo is out of focus
d) ISO: 200 Reason: there is little to no noise

Photo #4
a) Paul Strand, Wall Street, 1915
b) SS: 1000 Reason: the motion of the photo is captured without blurring
c) F12 Reason: the whole photo is in focus
d) ISO: 200 Reason: there is no noticeable noise

Photo #5
a) Anne Leibovitz, The white Stripes, 2003
b) SS: 1200 Reason: the subjects' motion is caught without blurring
c) F6.5 Reason: the fore ground is in focus while the background is out of focus
d) ISO: 200 Reason: there is no noise in the photo

Perfect! Your suggested settings and rationale are both right on target. Keep up the good work.
ReplyDelete